It is long known that executive legislation is written to favour debtors, a fact that they are skilfully exploiting. Debtors have become very rational in writing objections through the years. Objections, especially when they are drafted by the debtors themselves without the help of a legal expert, are usually very short, they are mostly focused on pretending a debt, any prepayments or any obstacles, why they haven't settled the debt, do not exist. At first glance it is obvious that such objections are thought up and filed only to stall the procedure.
Case law now made an end to this. A position has been formed among the courts, that it is unjust, that a debtor can stall a judicial enforcement for several years using such "cheap tricks", which is why they made it possible for the creditors, to get temporary insurance by issuing preliminary injunctions. In practice, temporary insurance means that the debtors bank account is blocked for the enforced sum. In a time when credit ratings of individual companies are extremely important, a blocked bank account is an effective way to get debtors to consider, whether it is worth it, to stick to their absurd objection, if the creditor was already successful in blocking their bank account.
Over 90 % of debtors (from our experience) are ready to make a deal with the creditor and repay their debts relatively quickly, once they receive a preliminary injunction.